200 - Disagreeing Together
Today’s episode is brought to you by our Patrons over at Patreon.com/reasontogether. Thank you for your support!
Today on RTP — In this very special episode, we come together for the 200th time to hash out ways to connect faith to practice. Then, several of our listeners take us for a trip down memory lane. Our QC editor said this episode is “in the top ten out of all of our episodes” and one of the “cornerstone” episodes of RTP. We hope you enjoy it! We sure did! Don’t miss the FREE Aftershow episode!
SHOW NOTES:
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief by Jordan Peterson
Christian UNITY in theology and textual criticism with Disciple Dojo! (YouTube link)
The Rise in DINKs, SINKs, DINKWADs, KIPPERs and More
Scripture Verses Cited: Ecclesiastes 1:2, 14
Today’s episode is brought to you by our Patrons over at Patreon.com/reasontogether. Thank you for your support!
Your support helps us pay our podcast editor, technical editor, writers, and upgrade our site to offer merch.
The waters have recently been stirred in conservative circles regarding the modernization of the King James Version. Permit me to make a few observations regarding the fuller discussion that needs to take place.
A recent article regarding the KJV debate seems to be making a comeback for the plowboys — those who desire the Bible in their own common tongue.
“I would encourage you to deny the myth that a woman, raising children in her home, is somehow in a helpless position with no viable outlet for her talents.”
Is it possible that one great, more full sermon per week could be far more effective than three or four sermons prepared without accountability? How do church activities effect the preaching quality?
Has the distinction between missionaries and church planters placed undue burden on U.S. church planters and put them under needless financial risk?
To the preacher who seeks to understand God and relate that understanding to the people, every single passage comes to life!
What happens when sermon illustrations are used improperly?